JUser: :_load: non è stato possibile caricare l'utente con ID: 91656

While activated sludge processes are still very broadly used, they can be quite formidable to operate properly. Lack of control may end up in loss of the activated sludge, decimation of the microorganism inhabitants, and non-compliance with permits and regulations. Traditional activated sludge processes require a big footprint and high preliminary capital costs.

On account of these issues with the activated sludge process, newer applied sciences have been developed over the past few years. The Sequencing Batch Reactor (SBR) and Membrane Bioreactors (MBR) processes are such technologies.

Using SBR and MBR have become widespread in the Food and Beverage trade, as a result of typical wastewater composition, a basic tightening of discharge regulations, and water shortages. MBR and SBR handled wastewater is much better suited for reuse or recycle than activated sludge treated effluent.

Sequencing Batch Reactor (SBR)

A SBR typically consists of at the least two identically equipped reactors with a standard inlet, valved to direct flow to one reactor or the other.

As the name implies the reactors are designed to work as batch operations, thus the necessity for 2 or more in parallel as a way to handle the influent.

Whereas many SBR configurations are possible relying upon the precise software the essential process follows these five stages:

idle/waste sludge
Typically one or more reactors will likely be within the settle/decant stage whereas one or more reactors will be either aerating and or filling.

The fill stage will both be anoxic or aerated. The anoxic environment removes nitrate, allows growth of bacteria, controls aerobic filamentous organisms and the design time is a perform of BOD and TKN loads, BOD:P ratio, temperature and effluent requirements. Aerated fill treats and removes BOD, allows for nitrification/denitrification and the design time can also be a operate of the same parameters during anoxic fill. Within the reaction stage the activated sludge is combined and aerated to remove BOD, obtain nitrification, improve phosphorous uptake, and to denitrify with anoxic/cardio react for low effluent nitrate requirements. The react part is followed by the settling stage throughout which period suspended solids settle to the underside of the reactor for removal.

In the decanting process stage the clarified water is drawn off for re-use, discharge, or additional treatment.

SBR therapy techniques by nature are simpler to operate than steady circulate methods since each batch might be handled and managed separately.

High high quality effluent can consistently be achieved and no sludge recycling decreases capital and operation and upkeep prices compared to a traditional system.

Microorganism selection minimizes sludge bulking and controls filaments while providing biological phosphorous removal. The reactor design permits for quiescent settling previous to decanting, reduces space requirements, and provides for operations flexibility. The process inherently is capable of biological nutrient removal, reduces operational costs by automated controls and equipment, and reduces energy financial savings as a result of decrease oxygen requirements.

membrane bioreactors for wastewater treatment Bioreactors (MBR)

Within the MBR process, the system combines activated sludge treatment with a membrane liquid-solid separation process. The membrane part uses low pressure microfiltration or ultra filtration membranes and eliminates the necessity for clarification and tertiary filtration. The membranes can be physically installed in the bioreactor tank, or in a separate tank. For many processes submerging the membranes in the bioreactor tank proves to provide probably the most environment friendly and cost effective solution.

The membranes used in the MBR process have very small pore sizes (typically 0.04 - 0.4 microns). Almost complete separation of suspended solids from the blended liquor might be achieved. This fact, together with its fundamental design results in dramatic reductions in contaminants.

Nonetheless, MBR is not with out its drawbacks, the most important of which is membrane fouling-no shock given the operating conditions to which the membranes are exposed. Fouling gradually reduces process efficiency causing cross-membrane pressures to extend or permeate flows to decrease depending whether the process is operated beneath constant pressure or fixed flux conditions respectively. Whereas automated cleansing regimens minimize the impression of membrane fouling, the cleaning and replacement must nonetheless be analyzed and factored into the general analysis of MBR viability for any project.